A bridge on the Tōkaidō with Mount Fuji in the back. Bridges on the Tōkaidō were far more common than is generally thought.
As we discovered in Crossing Japan’s Raging Rivers and Piggybacking the Tōkaidō’s Mightiest Rivers, many rivers in Japan could turn so wild that bridges could not be built. These rivers could only be crossed by ferry or with the help of specialized river porters.
Nonetheless, the Tōkaidō had a surprisingly large number of bridges.
Tokaido Water Crossings
This map shows major water crossings and ferry ports on the Tōkaidō and its extension, the Ōsaka Kaidō (between numbers 1 and 4). Each dot represents a station (宿, shuku). Blue stations have a major ferry or water crossing nearby.
The list below shows the names of the stations and rivers on the map as well as the type of water crossing. The numbers in the “Map” column refer to the numbers on the map. The “No.” column shows the Tōkaidō station numbers. For example, Otsu (number 4 on the map) is the 53rd station on the Tōkaidō.
Map | Station | No. | River | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kōraibashi, Osaka | End | Higashi-Yokobori | Ferry, Bridge |
2 | Fushimi, Kyoto | 54 | Yodo | Ferry |
3 | Sanjō Ōhashi, Kyoto | End | Kamo | Bridge |
4 | Otsu | 53 | N/A | N/A |
5 | Kusatsu | 52 | Seta | Bridge |
6 | Kuwana | 42 | Nagara, Ibi, Kiso (Ise Bay) | Ferry, Bridge |
7 | Miya | 41 | Nagara, Ibi, Kiso (Ise Bay) | Ferry |
8 | Okazaki | 38 | Yahagi | Bridge |
9 | Yoshida | 34 | Toyo | Bridge |
10 | Arai | 31 | (Lake Hamana) | Ferry |
11 | Maisaka | 30 | (Lake Hamana) | Ferry |
12 | Mitsuke | 28 | Tenryû | Ferry |
13 | Kakegawa | 26 | Futase | Bridge |
14 | Kanaya | 24 | Ōi | Ford |
15 | Shimada | 23 | Ōi | Ford |
16 | Fujieda | 22 | Seto | Ford |
17 | Fuchū | 19 | Abe | Ford |
18 | Okitsu | 17 | Okitsu | Ford |
19 | Yui | 16 | Yui | Ford |
20 | Kanbara | 15 | Fuji | Ferry |
21 | Odawara | 9 | Sakawa | Ford |
22 | Hiratsuka | 7 | Banyū | Ferry |
23 | Kawasaki | 2 | Tama (aka Rokugō) | Ferry |
24 | Nihonbashi, Edo | Start | Nihonbashi | Bridge |
These crossings are just the major ones. There were countless smaller ones on the Tōkaidō. Many of these featured a bridge.
We know exactly how many bridges thanks to ground-breaking research published in 2011 (Heisei 23) by transportation systems engineer Kenichi Takebe (武部健一, 1925–2015). Takebe counted an astounding 1,096 bridges:1
- 558 stone bridges
- 409 earthen bridges
- 129 wooden ones
“Earthen bridges” were wooden bridges with flattened earth on top, such as Kyoto’s famed Togetsukyō Bridge (not part of the Tōkaidō):
The great majority of the Tōkaidō bridges were small. Three quarters measured less than five and a half meters in length.
However, 23 bridges measured between 36 and 90 meters in length and six were over 90 meters. The longest bridge was at Okazaki (number 8 on the map) and measured over 283 meters. The second longest, at 227 meters, was at Kuwana (6).2
At 224 meters, the famous Seta no Karahashi Bridge (5) near Kyoto should be third. But it consisted of two bridges connected by an island and Takebe only included the larger one in his list. He measured it at almost 165 meters, making it the fourth-largest bridge on the Tōkaidō.
In comparison, the current Sanjō Ōhashi (3) in Kyoto is 73 meters long, while the Nihonbashi Bridge (4) in Tokyo measures about 50 meters.
Some bridges were made with boats so they could more easily adjust to the changing water levels. During autumn and winter, when water levels were low, temporary bridges (仮橋, karibashi) were also built at many rivers.3 These could be pontoon bridges or simple wooden bridges.
Temporary Bridges
The use of temporary bridges, as well as the enormous variations in water levels described in Crossing Japan’s ‘Raging Rivers’, is beautifully illustrated by an anecdote culled from the Yokohama-based magazine The Far East. A december 1871 issue covered the first installment of a month-long journey into the countryside made by three Englishmen and their six Japanese attendants.
Near Odawara the party was carried across the intimidating waters of the Sakawagawa River (酒匂川, number 21 on the map). The water was as high as the chests of the porters, who struggled with the current. But when a photographer was later sent he only found “some four or five narrow streams” spanned by three small temporary bridges:4
Temporary bridges may have been helpful, they also gave travelers a false sense of security that caused its own problems. The travel guide Ryokō Yōjinshū (旅行用心集, Precautions for Travelers), published in 1810 (Bunka 7) by author Yasumi Roan (八隅 蘆菴), specifically warned travelers about their dangers:5
Myth or Fact?
Countless accounts about the Tōkaidō claim that rivers on the route were not bridged because of military considerations. It would have slowed down western lords during an invasion of Edo, the seat of the Tokugawa government.
In his 1995 study Breaking Barriers: Travel and the State in Early Modern Japan American historian Constantine Nomikos Vaporis convincingly argues against this notion. Many of such statements have no basis, he writes.6
Vaporis attributes the lack of bridges at certain rivers to topographical issues, technological limits, and socio-economic reasons.
For example, during the 1600s there was a bridge across the Tamagawa near Kawasaki, a strategic river crossing right on the doorstep of Edo. It was washed away in 1612, 1643, 1647, 1659, 1671, and 1680. Each time the shogunate rebuilt the bridge. But after it was washed away again in 1680 it gave up and a ferry system was used instead. From 1703, however, every year a small temporary bridge was built for use during fall and winter when water levels were low.7
At the center of the no bridges for defensive reasons argument has been the Ōigawa River, where travelers were carried across by specialized porters. It was 1.3 kilometers wide, significantly wider than the longest bridge on the Tōkaidō.8
Accounts about the Ōigawa often mention that a bridge was not allowed there because of military considerations. For most of the Edo Period (1603–1868) the motivations were actually economic, argues Vaporis:9
This opposition was natural, writes Vaporis, because “a ferry-boat operation would have put many of the river-crossing porters out of work.” Their number was substantial—each station counted hundreds of porters. By the end of the Edo Period the two towns employed over 1300 porters.10
Vaporis adds that charges for ferries were “considerably lower than for fording.” Cutting out the porters would have ruined the economies of the two stations.
Takebe’s research, published 16 years after Breaking Barriers has strengthened Vaporis’ argument. It shows that there were in effect many bridges on the Tōkaidō, with 23 bridges measuring between 36 and 90 meters and six over 90 meters.
If the shogunate did indeed not want bridges on the Tōkaidō, then why were so many built—even one right on Edo’s doorstep?
This essay is funded by readers like you
Old Photos of Japan provides thoroughly researched essays and rare images of daily life in old Japan free of charge and advertising. Most images have been acquired, scanned, and conserved to protect them for future generations.
I rely on readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support this work.
About the Photo
The top photo shows Kawaibashi Bridge (河合橋) spanning the Numakawa River (沼川) near Taganoura (田子の浦), in what is now Fuji, Shizuoka Prefecture. This spot was famous as one of the most scenic bridges on the Tōkaidō. There still is a bridge at this spot, but the beautiful view has long gone.
This photo is listed in the catalogue of Kimbei Kusakabe, but the site of the Nagasaki University Library claims it was taken by Shizuoka-based photographer Hanbei Mizuno (水野半兵衛).
Notes
1 武部健一(2011). 近世東海道の橋梁の全貌とその分析 土木学会土木史研究委員会 土木史研究 編 31 67-74, 2011.
2 ibid.
3 Vaporis, Constantine Nomikos (1995). Breaking Barriers: Travel and the State in Early Modern Japan. Harvard East Asia Monographs, 54.
4 The Far East, Vol. II, No. XIII, December 1, 1871. Retrieved on 2024-02-01.
5 Vaporis, Constantine N. Caveat Viator. Advice to Travelers in the Edo Period. Monumenta Nipponica, vol. 44, no. 4, 1989, pp. 461–83. Retrieved on 2024-01-08.
6 Vaporis, Constantine Nomikos (1995). Breaking Barriers: Travel and the State in Early Modern Japan. Harvard East Asia Monographs, 48–55.
7 ibid, 52–54.
8 武部健一(2011). 近世東海道の橋梁の全貌とその分析 土木学会土木史研究委員会 土木史研究 編 31 67-74, 2011.
9 Vaporis, Constantine Nomikos (1995). Breaking Barriers: Travel and the State in Early Modern Japan. Harvard East Asia Monographs, 55.
10 Data provided by Shimada City.
Published
Reader Supported
Old Photos of Japan aims to be your personal museum for Japan's visual heritage and to bring the experiences of everyday life in old Japan to you.
To enhance our understanding of Japanese culture and society I track down, acquire, archive, and research images of everyday life, and give them context.
I share what I have found for free on this site, without ads or selling your data.
Your support helps me to continue doing so, and ensures that this exceptional visual heritage will not be lost and forgotten.
Thank you,
Kjeld Duits
Reference for Citations
Duits, Kjeld (). Shizuoka 1880s: Bridge on the Tōkaidō, OLD PHOTOS of JAPAN. Retrieved on September 16, 2024 (GMT) from https://www.oldphotosjapan.com/photos/936/albumen-print-bridge-on-the-tokaido-kimbei-kusakabe-1880s-meiji-period
Noel
As for the top photo I also have doubts about the Kimbei attribution. This particular landscape was quite popular and it’s evident, that at some point the bridge was rebuilt or modernized. From the eight photos from my digital collection only three feature the “original” bridge – the one posted above, one taken by Farsari (C12 Yoda Bridge) and one taken by Beato/ Stillfried. What’s more interesting, not one caption mentions Numakawa as the name of the river – in two cases the captions says “Suzukawa”. The Nagasaki Database isn’t helping as both names are used alternately.
The last bridge (bamboo suspension bridge) was also often photographed, but not many information can be found. From the captions we know that the river is Fujikawa, the bridge is mentioned once as “Fudzibashi” and the location “at Kai (near Fuji)”. According to the Nagasaki Database the bride is called Kamaguchi.
#000797 ·
Kjeld (Author)
@Noel: Good to hear from you again, Noel. I was wondering why you were so quiet recently.
There is no uncertainty about the name and location of the Kawaibashi Bridge and the Numakawa as both still exist today. When one uses Google Street View one can see the exact same angle of Mt. Fuji as seen in the top photo.
Interestingly, Suzukawa is a misreading of 須津川. The correct reading is Sudōkawa. This rivers flows into the Numakawa fairly close to the bridge, which is probably how the mixup originated.
I believe that the Kamaguchibashi Bridge is a different bridge from the one shown on the image in this article. The bridge is constructed differently, connected differently, and the rock formations and vegetation look different.
However, the mountains in the background do seem similar, and there are houses at the foot of the mountains in this image as well as in images of the Kamaguchibashi. It is possible that my image is perhaps an earlier bridge by the same name a few meters closer towards the mountains. It was quite common to rebuild a bridge nearby so the old one could be used until the new one was completed.
Because of this uncertainty I decided not to name a possible location in the caption.
#000798 ·
Noel
@Kjeld: I’ve been quite busy with work and unfortunately didn’t have much time to spend on photography. As I can see I have lots of reading to catch up. :)
Considering the last photo once again – this is the same bridge, but from a farther perspective. You took the description from the Nagasaki Database, so I thought the location was approved.
#000799 ·
Kjeld (Author)
@Noel: I hope it has been “good” busy, Noel!
I think there is indeed a lot to catch up on… I just checked your last comment. That was July 16, 2022. If that was also the last time that you checked the site, there are about 31 new articles :-)
#000800 ·
Kjeld (Author)
I believe that the bridge in your link and the one in this article are not the same. The bridges are constructed differently, connected differently, and the rock formations and vegetation look different.
#000801 ·
Noel
I think that the locaton is exactly the same – the change in perspective or even the water level can significantly infuence the final outcome. Some of the photos were taken 10 or 20 years apart, so the bridge might have been replaced with a newer one. I’ve made a little comparison chart : the top left image shows the bridge as more springy and tightened, while the others are more “droopy”. However the mountain range is undoubtly the same.
#000802 ·
Ted Taylor
A nice piece, as always. Are you familiar with the Nagarebashi near Yawata in Kyoto? Besides clever construction, it’s very picturesque (and often seen in films).
(I’ve also just written a (soon to be published) piece on the Chinkabashi submersible bridges of the Shimanto-gawa in Shikoku.)
#000803 ·
Kjeld (Author)
@Ted Taylor: I don’t think I was familiar with that bridge, Ted. Thanks! It reminds me a little of the Hozu Kobashi Bridge that you cross under when doing the Hozugawa Kudari from Kameoka.
Looking forward to reading about the Chinkabashi!
#000806 ·
Kjeld (Author)
@Noel: I am a little confused. Isn’t your Feb 27 comment basically saying what I also wrote on Feb 21? Bridges built at different times at locations very close to each other?
#000807 ·