help save Japan’s visual heritage of daily life
support

Recent Comments


Japan's Vanished Portable Fireplaces

(Author)

@Alistair Vogan: Thank you for sharing this, Alistair. I love how you describe the past of your home and its hibachi. Would love to see photos. Do you have a page somewhere?

I used to have family in Nara and used to visit a lot. To live in an old Meiji era structure in Nara — how extremely fortunate you are!

·


This is a wonderful article. I grew up in Canada with what we thought were hibachi, cooking Oscar Meyer wieners over the coals made bright red by lighting fluid. Years later, I came to live in Japan and now call an old Meiji era structure in Nara city home. The previous inhabitants had built and lived in it uninterrupted for many generations. When we switched ownership, we were delighted to discover they had left us a variety of hibachi that they seem to have continued to use until the very end. Even now, the soft charcoal that accumulated over the years fills these hibachi. I think about the early morning conversations, the exchanges of ideas and daily concerns expressed while sipping tea, and the whispered neighborhood gossip or witty exchanges as the sake flowed, all arising briefly around these hibachi as that energy from the sun captured in photosynthesis long before was gently released into the air as heat for these people.

·



Nagoya Castle

@Kjeld Duits: Well, I’m not from the U.S. either, so the name of the city might not tell you much, but anyway greetings from Poland in Central Europe. :)

·


(Author)

@Noel: Thanks for going on a search and sharing your results. Fascinating finds.

I take your assumption that I work from the U.S. as a compliment for my English ^_-

In what city are you located, Noel, if I may ask?

·


@Kjeld Dutis: Thank you for the reference photos, they are indeed “less popular” angles. I must say, after seeing them, the “L12 Nagoya Castle (C )” by Adolfo Farsari also has an unusual perspective.

It turns out that 140916-0168-PP and 190101-0006-PP were part of my digital archive since 2011, but the 190101-0007-PP was quite new to me. I could swear I’ve seen it somewhere before and so I did a little search and it popped up in Syracuse University Art Museum collection. What’s funny is that 140916-0168-PP can be found in Nagasaki Database, but it’s so heavily cropped that not only the Stillfried’s caption (and attribution), but the whole lower part of the photo is missing. Tokyo Photographic Art Museum also has a copy, but they didn’t recognize it as Nagoya Castle and simply captioned it as 城.

Lastly, I don’t know why, but I was somehow convinced you work from the U.S.. Sorry about that. :)

·


(Author)

@Noel: I checked my administration and the engineer apparently found three rare angles. They used 140916-0168-PP, 190101-0007-PP and 190101-0006-PP for their study. This was in early 2019.

Nagoya Castle is actually one of the best documented castles in Japan, but there are always blind spots.

They didn’t need to search for references abroad. I have lived and worked in Japan since 1982, and live in the center of Tokyo.

·



Yokohama Station

(Author)

@Ilshat Khusnutdinov:

1. The forecourt is the best distinction. See 110804-0029, 80302-0046-PP and 120820-0022. Both buildings were destroyed in 1923 and were rebuilt as completely different buildings.
2. I usually zoom in on larger maps, so linking to maps on MeijiShowa won’t help you much, I am afraid. There is a map showing the area around Shinbashi Station in this article (near bottom).
3. If you mean the white sign next to the building it says キリン (Kirin). This is likely an advertising sign for Kirin Beer. ‘Beer’ is probably hidden by the tree.

·


I have a few questions.:

1 – Yokohama and Shinbashi stations were built according to the same project. There are many photos of these stations and they are very similar. How can they be distinguished, especially by their facade? Do they have the same forecourt?
2 – Is there a map of this area, the same as the map of Yokohama that you presented?
3. What can be written on the sign hanging to the right (for us) of the building?

·



Nagoya Castle

@Kjeld Dutis: That’s an interesting story :) One would think that Japanese archives should be full of drawings, paintings and photos of such a popular building and yet they needed to search for reference in a foreign country. Now I wonder which angle are we talking about and if I’ve seen it before.

·


(Author)

@Noel: Great find, Noel! That caption is indeed in the same style as in 565. Thanks for sharing.

Incidentally, the main keep of Nagoya Castle was destroyed during WWII and rebuilt in concrete and steel. Some time over the next few years it will be restored to its original wooden form. Several years ago, one of the engineers involved visited me to study my photos of the castle, because I apparently have a photo taken from a rare angle.

·


I assume the “556” photo must be this one. The caption is the same style as in “565”. You can see the trees growing on the mount between the Honmaru and the white building, so they must’ve been taken in the same timeframe. In the Tamamura’s version the trees are absent.

Tamamura’s caption does seem to be plastered over another one, but I have no idea what it could have been. The only other copies I’ve seen had no caption at all.

·


(Author)

@Noel: Thanks, Noel. I agree with 16302-0038 being a heavily cropped variant of the image in the collection of the Kunstkamera Museum. As you know, when photographers borrowed from each other they often cropped out the caption.

The Kajima Seibei attribution is a fascinating observation. It has been a long time since I attributed 16302-0038 to Tamamura and my old brain can’t recall why I did so. I don’t seem to have made any notes about it.

Interestingly, Terry Bennett attributes an image numbered 556 to Kajima. The Kunstkamera Museum’s image is numbered 565 … 70602-0001, attributed to Tamamura, is numbered 555, but the number appears to have been pasted over a previous one!

Keep me posted if you find further verification.

·



Welcoming a Guest

(Author)

@Noel: I had already attributed this image to Farsari on MeijiShowa and in the metadata of the image, I just notice now. Must have forgotten to adjust it here. Once again, thanks!

·


(Author)

@Noel: Thanks, Noel. Excellent observation. I just noticed that I published this article in 2008, just a year after I started collecting and probably before I purchased Terry Bennett’s Old Japanese Photographs: Collectors’ Data Guide. Just checked it and he attributes this image to Farsari as well. I will adjust the attribution right away.

·




Nagoya Castle

@Kjeld Dutis: As far as I can tell your “16302-0038” is exactly the same as the one from the Kunstkamera Museum, just heavily cropped in comparison to the original. The style of caption would suggest Kajima Seibei, but it would need futher verification. There are two major differences between the photo from the article and the one from the museum website. Firstly, look at the roof of the dark building just in front of the Honmaru (slightly to the left) – in the Tamamura’s version it has a “double roof” (I have no idea how it’s called), while in the other photo the roof is simple and identical the whole lenght. Secondly, focus on the roof of the building in the foreground, the one set diagonaly. In the Tamamura’s version it hardly reaches the other white building, but in the other photo it almost touches it. In the time between those photos the building was extended, and you can also tell that by the difference in color of the roof tiles – the old part has darker tiles, probably covered in moss, and the new part has clean, bright tiles. I’m no expert in the castle history but there were quite significant renovations made in the time those two photographs were taken.

·



Welcoming a Guest

(Author)

@Ilshat Khusnutdinov: No problem at all. It is difficult to know all the intricacies of vintage Japanese photography without extensive study. It is a complex subject area that has only been studied intensively during the past few decades. There is still a lot that is unknown.

·


So I fell for it. :(
I’m sorry.

·


(Author)

@Ilshat Khusnutdinov: You are tumbling into the notoriously confusing world of attributing vintage photographs of Japan.

Photographers published each others photographs without crediting each other, making it extremely difficult to correctly attribute the photographer of an image. Often, photographers even put their own numbering system on the photographs of other photographers.

This is also true for Stoddard. We know that he travelled to Japan with a photographer, but we also know from his biography, written by D. Crane Taylor, that he mostly purchased images from local photographers or other sources. This gave him more time to do his research.

Some of the images in his book date from before his visits, and can be attributed to other photographers.

·


Hi. It seems that I accidentally discovered the author-photographer of many of your photos without authorship. John Lawson Stoddard (April 24, 1850 – June 5, 1931) was an American teacher, writer, and photographer. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lawson_Stoddard )

In his book (Japan: illustrated and decorated with one hundred and thirty-eight reproductions of photographs, 1897) I found many of your photographs. And this one too. If, of course, these are his pictures. :)
You can view this book here – https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=njp.32101054570955&seq=1

·